Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
2 (
2
); 57-59
doi:
10.4103/2319-2585.145604

U shaped sacral fracture with neurological injuries- report of two cases

Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Royal Children′s Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Address for correspondence: Dr. Aidin Sadeghilar, Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. E-mail: aidin_sadeghilar1@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

How to cite this article: Sadeghilar A, Ariffin MM, Rhani SA, Baharudin A. U shaped sacral fracture with neurological injuriesreport of two cases. J Orthop Allied Sci 2014;2:57-9.

Abstract

U shaped sacral fractures are uncommon and serious injuries that can be accompanied by lumbar plexus neurological dysfunction. We report two unique and frequently missed cases of U shaped sacral fractures with associated neurological deficit (Cauda Equina) which stabilized using Sacropelvic fixation with spinal instrumentation. We also performed laminectomy to decompress the lumbar plexus and preserve neurological function.

Keywords

Neurological deficit
sacropelvicfixation
U shaped sacral fracture

Introduction

Traumatic sacral fractures are rare cases due to their mechanism of injury which involves high-energy blunt trauma. This characteristic makes them difficult to diagnose which results in increased rate of morbidity and mortality. Sacral fractures could lead to neurovascular injuries as well as mechanical instabilities. Treatment of sacral fractures could be challenging in terms of reduction and stabilization that can be treated operatively and non-operatively with different surgical techniques.[1]

We present two rare and frequently missed cases of U shaped sacral fractures with associated neurological injury requiring decompression and spinopelvic stabilization. This case report describes the neurological, radiographic as well as functional outcomes in two patients with U shaped sacral fracture, after sacral laminectomy and spinopelvic fixation. Both patients were informed and consented for publication.

Case Report

The first case was a 23 year old male with history of fall from height and sustained a burst fracture of L2 along with a U shaped sacral fracture with Cauda Equina syndrome [Figure 1]. He also had a comminuted fracture of the left distal radius and left calcaneal fracture. He had incomplete neurological injury at L3 level with bowel and bladder incontinence. Spinal decompression was performed anteriorly at L2 level along with a sacral laminectomy. Long posterior spinopelvic fixation was done using the iliac bolt for fixation of the ilium and pedicle screws for the lumbar spine [Figure 2]. Fragment specific plates were used for the distal radius as well as a locking calcaneal plate for the calcaneum. Patient regained ambulatory capacity along with recovery of his bowel and bladder control in 3 month time.

Pre-operative CT scan is demonstrating Bilateral transverse sacral fracture in Sagittal and Axial views
Figure 1
Pre-operative CT scan is demonstrating Bilateral transverse sacral fracture in Sagittal and Axial views
AP and lateral postoperative lumbosacral radiographs
Figure 2
AP and lateral postoperative lumbosacral radiographs

The second case was a 19 year old female with history of fall from height. She sustained a compound left bimalleolar fracture and a U shaped sacral fracture with no neurological deficit [Figure 3]. An emergency debridement and fixation was performed for the bimalleolar fracture. Post trauma day 3 she developed radicular pain and numbness at right L5 nerve root with inability to move the right big toe. Her anal tone was lax. An emergency decompression and removal of bone fragment for the right L5 root, sacral laminectomy, and spinopelvic fixation was performed using a pedicle screw [Figure 4]. She regained her motor, sensory and anal sphincter power within the first week with return of bladder function in 6 weeks.

CT scan Sagittal and axial views are demonstrating bilateral transverse sacral fracture
Figure 3
CT scan Sagittal and axial views are demonstrating bilateral transverse sacral fracture
Postoperative radiographs including AP and lateral lumbosacral views
Figure 4
Postoperative radiographs including AP and lateral lumbosacral views

Discussion

U shaped fractures are easily missed in majority of poly trauma cases during resuscitation. The routine radiography of pelvis is not a good option to identify these fractures and most of the time CT scan or MRI imaging modalities will be needed for definitive diagnosis. Some reports show 49% missed sacral fracture in initial hospitalization.[2]

On the other hand, neurological deficit is commonly underdiagnosed during the initial assessment while neurovascular impairment associated with U shaped sacral fracture can be seen in a significant proportion of patients (33.0%) which is strongly influenced by the configuration and location of the sacral fracture.[3]

In spite of the great variety of reports in treatment options of patients with bilateral sacral fractures, no proper report exists to offer a conclusive guideline in management of these injuries.

Closed reduction and conservative management of sacral fractures have been suggested; however, due to high instability of these fractures, risk of fracture displacement is high over the time in which, immediate decompression and stabilization may be needed.[4] Proper reduction and maintenance of alignment for appropriate weight-bearing axis is highly recommended.[5]

It is suggested to reserve lumbosacral laminectomy and decompression for the cases with neurological deficit.[6] However, proponents of non-operative management believe that progressive functional restoration of spinal nerves may occur during a period of 12-18 months.[7] Although it is clear that recovery of nerve root contusion, transection or neurotmesis cannot occur, the aim of laminectomy and decompression is to help recovery of potentially viable nerve roots.[8]

U shaped sacral fracture is a multiplanar fracture comprised of bilateral, usually transforaminal, longitudinal fractures and a transverse fracture component which separates the upper central sacrum and remainder of the spine from the peripheral sacrum and the attached pelvis. The pattern of these fractures will lead to dissociation of the lumbar spine from the pelvic ring as well as lumbosacral instability.

In order to achieve stable fixation in our cases, spinopelvic fixation technique is used. This technique is considered as a stable option in transforaminal sacral fractures that was first developed by Kach and Trentz.[9] The aim of the construct is to stabilize the hemi-pelvis through connecting it to axial skeleton using screws and rods to lumbar vertebrae and ilium preventing vertical displacement.

Source of Support:

Nil

Conflict of Interest:

None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , , , , , , , , et al. Transverse sacral fractures with anterior displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(Supp II):346.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Sacral fractures: An important problem. Clin Orthop. 1988;227:67-81.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Neurologic deficits in major pelvic injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:222..
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Transverse sacral fractures with anterior displacement. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:342-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Sacral fractures: Current strategies in diagnosis and management. Orthopedics. 2009;32:752-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Transverse fractures of the sacrum. A report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:486-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Traction injury of the lumbosacral spinal nerve roots: Report of a case. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16:368-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Transverse sacral fractures: Case series and literature review. Can J Surg. 2001;44:359-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Distraction spondylodesis of the sacrum in" vertical shear lesions" of the pelvis. Unfallchirurg. 1994;97:28-38.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections