Correction of kyphosis by overcoming the challenge of pedicle screw fixation in previously augmented vertebrae by vertebroplasty

Shailesh Hadgaonkar; Himanshu Gurunath Kulkarni; Askhar Haphiz; Parag Sancheti; Ashok Shyam

doi:10.4103/JOASP.JOASP_25_21

CASE REPORT

Year : 2021 | Volume : 9 | Issue : 2 | Page : 90-93

Correction of kyphosis by overcoming the challenge of pedicle screw fixation in previously augmented vertebrae by vertebroplasty

Shailesh Hadgaonkar¹, Himanshu Gurunath Kulkarni¹, Askhar Haphiz¹, Parag Sancheti², Ashok Shyam²
¹ Department of Spine Surgery, Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, Maharashtra, India
² Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission	18-Apr-2021
Date of Acceptance	04-Feb-2022
Date of Web Publication	23-Jun-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Himanshu Gurunath Kulkarni
Department of Spine Surgery, Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, 16, 11/12, Shivajinagar, Thube Park, Pune 411005, Maharashtra
India

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/JOASP.JOASP_25_21

Abstract

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) is one of the most common degenerative spine pathologies that a spine surgeon comes across. Percutaneous cement augmented vertebroplasty or Balloon kyphoplasty are one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for OVCF. Spine surgeons may sometimes encounter situations in which they might need to operate for another spinal pathology, such as degenerative spinal instabilities, spinal infections, and neoplasms, which warrant posterior instrumented stabilization in patients who have already undergone vertebroplasty. Passing pedicle screws in these vertebrae can be very difficult and if these levels are skipped, the span of the fixation may increase and involve more normal levels for the sake of the stability of the construct. We present a case of a 49-year-old male with severe back pain, Cushing’s syndrome, and thoracicolumbar kyphosis occurring due to multiple osteoporotic fractures, which had been previously treated with vertebroplasties at five levels. With meticulous preoperative planning with CT scans and whole spine X-rays, pedicle screws were passed in vertebrae that had been previously augmented with vertebroplasty. Kyphosis and sagittal balance were completely corrected, and the patient exhibited significant symptomatic improvement. So, we suggest that even though many surgeons feel that the presence of vertebroplasty contraindicates the placement of pedicle screws in the vertebrae previously treated with vertebroplasty, it is feasible with proper preoperative planning.

Keywords: Balloon kyphoplasty, cement augmented vertebroplasty, progressive kyphosis, sagittal balance

How to cite this article:
Hadgaonkar S, Kulkarni HG, Haphiz A, Sancheti P, Shyam A. Correction of kyphosis by overcoming the challenge of pedicle screw fixation in previously augmented vertebrae by vertebroplasty. J Orthop Spine 2021;9:90-3

How to cite this URL:
Hadgaonkar S, Kulkarni HG, Haphiz A, Sancheti P, Shyam A. Correction of kyphosis by overcoming the challenge of pedicle screw fixation in previously augmented vertebrae by vertebroplasty. J Orthop Spine [serial online] 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 31];9:90-3. Available from: https://www.joas.org.in/text.asp?2021/9/2/90/347933

Introduction

Due to the advancements in medicine, enhanced life expectancy is responsible for making spine surgeons face a plethora of degenerative pathologies. Among all the sequelae of degeneration and osteoporosis, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) can sometimes be a tricky puzzle to solve. These are a leading cause of disability and morbidity in the elderly.^[1] Percutaneous cement augmented vertebroplasty or Balloon kyphoplasty are one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for OVCF. Spine surgeons may sometimes encounter situations in which they might need to operate for another spinal pathology, such as degenerative spinal instabilities, spinal infections, neoplasms etc., which warrant posterior instrumented stabilization in patients who have already undergone vertebroplasty. Passing pedicle screws in these vertebrae can be very difficult and if these levels are skipped, the span of the fixation may increase and involve more normal levels for the sake of the stability of the construct.^[2] Although a lot has been written about the safety and efficacy of cement-augmented screw fixation for enhanced pull-out strength in osteoporotic vertebrae, very scarce literature is available about the challenges of pedicle screw fixation in vertebrae previously treated with cement augmented vertebroplasty.^[3],[4] We present a case of correction of a progressive thoracicolumbar kyphosis occurring due to multiple osteoporotic fractures, which had been previously treated with vertebroplasties at five levels.

Case Report

A 49-year-old male presented with severe back pain and deformity of the back since two years. The patient was a known case of Cushing’s syndrome and had been operated for an adrenal tumor with adrenalectomy three years earlier. He had also been operated with cement augmented vertebroplasties at multiple vertebral levels elsewhere one year earlier. Even after the procedure, the patient had no symptomatic relief. The VAS score at present was 7 and the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) was 68.2 on examination. The patient had no loss of power in the lower limbs or loss of bladder/ bowel sensations or any signs suggesting an upper motor lesion. Routine blood investigations showed no significant abnormality. A DXA scan revealed the lumbar T score to be -2.7, which indicated osteoporosis. The X-ray revealed that the patient had multiple osteoporotic fractures, resulting in thoracicolumbar kyphosis [Figure 1]. Sagittal balance was lost with the plumb line from C7 falling anterior to S1 vertebra. Cement augmentation was done at five levels, D10-11–12 and L1, L3.

Figure 1: Showing multiple OVCF, positive sagittal balance, and five vertebrae augmented with bone cement

Click here to view

The X-ray also revealed global kyphosis from D7 to L4, complete loss of lumbar lordosis with kyphosis angle being 65⁰ [Figure 2].

Figure 2: Global kyphosis with K angle of 65⁰

Click here to view

An MRI showed no significant neurological compromise at any level but revealed a fresh OVCF at D7 level. A CT scan was done for the decision making of the screw placement. The mid-axial cuts of the CT scan were examined, and a decision was taken about the possibility of placing the screws at every level, especially those that had already been augmented with bone cement during the vertebroplasty. The lengths of the screws were decided depending on the space available [Figure 3].

Figure 3: (A) Axial cut of D10 showing relatively empty right half. (B) Axial cut of D11 showing the cement completely occupying the body. (C) Axial cut of D12 showing minimal cement filling in the body

Click here to view

During the procedure via a posterior midline approach, exposure was done from D4 to S2. Pedicle screws were inserted from D4 to S1. An iliac screw was placed from S2 in view of the length of the construct and the osteoporotic bone. Since the cement mantle had occupied almost the complete vertebral body, D11 was omitted from fixation. In other augmented levels, even though the trajectories of screws were not completely ideal, screws were successfully passed, negotiating the cement mantle in the body [Figure 4].

Figure 4: Intraoperative image showing the D10 screw passed superior to the cement mantle

Click here to view

Posterior column osteotomies were done at multiple levels. A well-contoured rod was fixed with the Cantilever technique, correcting the kyphosis. Further correction of kyphosis was done by intersegmental compression, lumbar lordosis was restored with the help of a similar technique, and closure was done. All spinous processes of fixed levels were stopped, and shingling of all laminae was done. Bone graft harvested from all spinous processes was mixed with allograft and was prepared in a bone mill. Copious graft was placed on a prepared posterior bed. Rehabilitation was started with the help of a brace. Since the patient had been previously operated for adrenelectomy, an endocrinologist was consulted and anti-osteoporotic medical treatment was started immediately. Postoperative X-rays revealed that thoracic kyphosis was restored at 38⁰ and lumbar lordosis was restored at 41⁰ [Figure 5]A. Sagittal balance was corrected too [Figure 5]B.

Figure 5: (A) Restoration of normal thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. (B) Restoration of normal sagittal balance

Click here to view

At the end of one year, patients’ posture and back pain were significantly improved (VAS- 2); MODI improved to 19.5. The patient was able to carry out all the daily activities without any hindrance.

Discussion

Percutaneous cement augmented vertebroplasty is one of the most popular treatment modalities for OVCF.^[5] Due to the minimally invasive nature of vertebroplasty, the minimal risks involved, and the short hospital stay, its use is widespread. It provides excellent results in the form of pain relief in OVCF Kummel’s lesions.^[6] However, once the PMMA cement has been injected, it will remain in the vertebral body for the entire duration of the patient’s life unless it is surgically removed. Spine surgeons may sometimes encounter situations in which they might need to operate for another spinal pathology, such as degenerative spinal instabilities, spinal infections of neoplasms etc., which warrant posterior instrumented stabilization in patients who have already undergone vertebroplasty. Inserting pedicle screws in the vertebrae that have already been augmented by bone cement has always been considered very difficult. Many surgeons feel that the presence of vertebroplasty contraindicates the placement of transpedicular instrumentation. Jae Hoo Park et al. studied 14 patients who required screw fixation at the level of the previous percutaneous vertebroplasty.^[7] They concluded that for patients with vertebrae previously augmented with bone cement, posterior screw fixation is not a contraindication, but it is a very feasible option. They classified the cement distribution patterns in cement augmented vertebrae on simple radiographs as follows:

1) Solid compact cement filling

2) Trabecular-type/sponge-like cement filling

They concluded that Type 2 cement fillings can be penetrated by the pedicle screws, which will be unlikely in Type 1 filling patterns.

On a technical note, Joanna Gernsback and Michael Wang presented a technique that involved drilling through the cement mantle in the vertebral body with a cannulated reamer and passing a cannulated pedicle screw in the cement mantle over the guide wire.^[8] We made no such attempt in D11 in which the cement occupied almost the whole body and left no space for the pedicle screw.

CT scans are the mainstay in preoperative planning. The axial cuts of every augmented vertebral level can give the surgeon an exact idea about the cement filling in the vertebral body. The screws can be passed in a trajectory negotiating the cement mantle in the vertebral body. Screw insertion in old, healed non-augmented OVCF can also be tricky because the altered and reduced shape of the body can make it difficult to pass the screw in an ideal trajectory that is of optimal length. We successfully overcame this with inferiorly directed 45 mm screws in L2 and L4.

Conclusion

Although difficult, the placement of pedicle screws in the vertebrae previously treated with vertebroplasty is feasible. Careful preoperative assessment in the form of plain radiographs and a CT scan is extremely helpful. Although the trajectory of the screw may not be ideal, the cement mantle can be successfully bypassed while passing the screws. Care should be taken not to breach the pedicle wall.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1.	Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, Skalli W, Farcy JP Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: Age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E959-67.
2.	Ha KY, Kim YH, Chang DG, Son IN, Kim KW, Kim SE Causes of late revision surgery after bone cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Asian Spine J 2013;7:294-300.
3.	Jung HJ, Kim SW, Ju CI, Kim SH, Kim HS Bone cement-augmented short segment fixation with percutaneous screws for thoracolumbar burst fractures accompanied by severe osteoporosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012;52:353-8.
4.	Kim HS, Kim SH, Ju CI, Kim SW, Lee SM, Shin H The role of bone cement augmentation in the treatment of chronic symptomatic osteoporotic compression fracture. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010:48:490-5.
5.	Xiaochun Li M, Min Yao M, Penfei Y, Xiang Qian M. Comparing pain reduction following vertebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Physician2013;16:455-64.
6.	Chen LH, Lai PL, Chen WJ. Unipedicle percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal intraosseous vacuum cleft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;435:148-53.
7.	Park JH, Ju CI, Kim SW. Posterior screw fixation in previously augmented vertebrae with bone cement: Is it inapplicable? J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2018;61:114-9.
8.	Gernsback JE, Wang MY Percutaneous pedicle screw placement into a spinal segment previously treated with vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:786-91.